Josh Berkus wrote:
Between major improvements to performance, major changes to the file format, and changes to implicit conversions breaking backwards compatibility, our new ability to more-or-less stick to deadlines ...

... should this be 9.0 instead of 8.3? Seems like it'd be both an annoucement of how far we've come, as well as a warning to users that the 8.2-->9.0 upgrade could be painful. And that some of our more radical features in the new version could have some rough edges.

Of course, that does put is closer to 10.0 which is going to break a lot of packager's scripts. ;-)


I like 8.3 better personally.

---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 4: Have you searched our list archives?


Reply via email to