Josh, List,
On 4/23/07, Josh Berkus <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hackers,
I was thinking about the upcoming release on my 32-hour epic airplane ordeal,
and realizing that it changes PostgreSQL in a lot of ways. Between major
improvements to performance, major changes to the file format, and changes to
implicit conversions breaking backwards compatibility, our new ability to
more-or-less stick to deadlines ...
... should this be 9.0 instead of 8.3?
Seems like it'd be both an annoucement of how far we've come, as well as a
warning to users that the 8.2-->9.0 upgrade could be painful. And that some
of our more radical features in the new version could have some rough edges.
as a casual user, only subscribed to this list, i think you should
really consider it.
a bunch of problems due toa minor-release-number upgrade would come
as a suprise.
a major-release-number- upgrade i would investigate more thorough.
regards,
usleep
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 4: Have you searched our list archives?
http://archives.postgresql.org
