> > 1) To deal with partial/inconsisitent write to the data file at
> > recovery, we need full page writes at the first modification to
> > after each checkpoint.   It consumes much of WAL space.
> We need to find a way around this someday.  Other DBs don't 
> do this; it may be becuase they're less durable, or because 
> they fixed the problem.

They eighter can only detect a failure later (this may be a very long
time depending on access and verify runs) or they also write page
images. Those that write page images usually write "before images" to a
different area that is cleared periodically (e.g. during checkpoint).

Writing to a different area was considered in pg, but there were more
negative issues than positive.
So imho pg_compresslog is the correct path forward. The current
discussion is only about whether we want a more complex pg_compresslog
and no change to current WAL, or an increased WAL size for a less
complex implementation.
Both would be able to compress the WAL to the same "archive log" size.


---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 1: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate
       subscribe-nomail command to [EMAIL PROTECTED] so that your
       message can get through to the mailing list cleanly

Reply via email to