Bruce Momjian wrote: > > Your patch has been added to the PostgreSQL unapplied patches list at: > > http://momjian.postgresql.org/cgi-bin/pgpatches > > It will be applied as soon as one of the PostgreSQL committers reviews > and approves it.
Wait a minute. Would the mentioned patch be this one? http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.db.postgresql.devel.general/73330 Because it was later declared not working; see http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.db.postgresql.devel.general/73334 > Jeff Davis wrote: > > > > This thread here became a TODO item: > > > > http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2006-11/msg01011.php > > > > During that discussion a patch was produced that nobody seemed to have > > objections to. The main problem seemed to be that it wouldn't always > > downgrade the lock on a ROLLBACK TO (as I understand it), which doesn't > > seem like a problem to me. -- Alvaro Herrera http://www.CommandPrompt.com/ The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc. ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 2: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster
