"Andrew Hammond" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On 5/17/07, Tom Lane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> What are the grounds for defining it that way rather than some other
>> way?

> The only alternative that came to mind when I wrote it was using a numeric
> instead of float.

No, I'm wondering what's the justification for smashing it to a single
number at all, when the inputs are three-field values.  Interval divided
by float doesn't produce just a float, for example.

                        regards, tom lane

---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 1: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate
       subscribe-nomail command to [EMAIL PROTECTED] so that your
       message can get through to the mailing list cleanly

Reply via email to