Tom Lane wrote:
I'm kind of leaning to the separate-tally method and abandoning the assumption that the identities hold. I'm not wedded to the idea though. Any thoughts?
That seems like the best approach to me. Like the scan/fetch counters, n_tup_ins and n_tup_del represent work done regardless of commit/rollback, but n_live_tup and n_dead_tup represent the current state of the table.
-- Heikki Linnakangas EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 1: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate subscribe-nomail command to [EMAIL PROTECTED] so that your message can get through to the mailing list cleanly
