* Alvaro Herrera ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > Stephen Frost wrote: > > Yeah, I wouldn't want one per second. > > It's not one per second, it's after one second (actually > deadlock_timeout) has elapsed since you started to sleep waiting for a > lock. If a deadlock is not detected the process won't be awakened > again.
Ah, I see.. Actually, if it's just one NOTICE after one second, I think that'd be fine. Sorry, misunderstood what was going on. Thanks! Stephen
Description: Digital signature