* Alvaro Herrera ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> Stephen Frost wrote:
> > Yeah, I wouldn't want one per second.
> It's not one per second, it's after one second (actually
> deadlock_timeout) has elapsed since you started to sleep waiting for a
> lock.  If a deadlock is not detected the process won't be awakened
> again.

Ah, I see..  Actually, if it's just one NOTICE after one second, I think
that'd be fine.  Sorry, misunderstood what was going on.



Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Reply via email to