Josh Berkus <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I now have a simple test case which shows significant performance
> degradation on 8.3devel for a specific query, apparenly due to an
> unnecessary call to Top-N sort.
Advertising
It does the right thing if t_s_symb is declared as text instead of
varchar. When it's varchar, even setting enable_sort off won't make
it pick the right plan, which suggests that it fails to recognize that
the index can match the query's ORDER BY. I'm guessing I overlooked
a binary-compatibility case when I rejiggered the handling of PathKeys
in connection with the NULLS FIRST/LAST stuff. No time to look deeper
right now.
regards, tom lane
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 1: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate
subscribe-nomail command to [EMAIL PROTECTED] so that your
message can get through to the mailing list cleanly
