On Fri, 2007-06-01 at 14:12 -0400, Tom Lane wrote: > "Simon Riggs" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > I'm sorry guys but I don't agree this is a TODO item. > ... > > Also, methinks we should have agreed behaviour before we make something > > a TODO item. > > There is a whole *lot* of stuff in the TODO list that does not have a > consensus solution yet. You should not imagine that it's gospel.
Well, I don't, though many think it is and some have been surprised/annoyed to find out that implementing a TODO item doesn't mean automatic acceptance of the idea, let alone the code (not myself, I hasten to add). > At the same time, it'd be better if this item were worded more like > "investigate this issue" rather than presupposing a particular > form of answer. Agreed. -- Simon Riggs EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 3: Have you checked our extensive FAQ? http://www.postgresql.org/docs/faq
