> -----Original Message-----
> From: Martijn van Oosterhout [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Monday, June 11, 2007 3:29 PM
> To: Dann Corbit
> Cc: Alvaro Herrera; Gregory Stark; firstname.lastname@example.org; Larry
> Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Selecting a constant question
> On Mon, Jun 11, 2007 at 03:18:33PM -0700, Dann Corbit wrote:
> > Sure, but when I bind to a grid, I need to know a-priori how big the
> > biggest returned instance can be. Reading the entire data set twice
> > learn the size of a constant seems rather conceptually odd to me.
> To be honest, the concept that a widget requires a constant that can't
> be changed later is also a bit odd.
Not when the data itself is a constant that cannot be changed.
> There are many times you won't know
> beforehand how big the data is, surely the framework should be smart
> enough to handle these cases?
If it were impossible to know the size of a string constant supplied in
the query, then I think I would agree with you here. However, it seems
to me that the maximum possible size of such a known, constant-width
string is not hard to determine.
> Start the width at 100, if it turns out to be too small, make it
If that were a good idea, then why report data sizes at all? Just let
it always be a surprise when it comes streaming down the pipe.
Honestly, I cannot fathom this answer.
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 3: Have you checked our extensive FAQ?