Stephen Frost wrote:
* Dave Page ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
/* We only show the rel name, not schema name */
relname = get_rel_name(rte->relid);
Anyone know why? This seems like a bug to me given the ambiguity of
possible output.
I'd assume it's to keep the explain output smaller with the
expectation/assumption that in general you're going to know. A possible
work-around would be to just always provide table aliases for your
queries, as those are shown in the explain.
I am hoping that once we have WITH RECURSIVE, we could optionally
provide a normalized dump into a table of the EXPLAIN output, that could
then be easily "connected" the the old output using WITH RECURSIVE.
regards,
Lukas
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 1: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate
subscribe-nomail command to [EMAIL PROTECTED] so that your
message can get through to the mailing list cleanly
