Andrew Dunstan wrote:



Tom Lane wrote:
I agree with the idea of having an option to get EXPLAIN's output in
an entirely different, more machine-readable format.  Not wedded to
XML, but I fear that a pure relational structure might be too strict ---
there's a lot of variability in the entries already.  XML also could
deal naturally with nesting, whereas we'd have to jump through hoops
to represent the plan tree structure in relational form.


I agree. XML seems like a fairly natural fit for this. Just as people should not try to shoehorn everything into XML, neither should they try to shoehorn everything into a relational format either.

Now all we need is an XML schema for it ;-)

Well I am not a big fan of XML but it certainly seems applicable in this case.

Joshua D. Drake



cheers

andrew

---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 7: You can help support the PostgreSQL project by donating at

               http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate



--

      === The PostgreSQL Company: Command Prompt, Inc. ===
Sales/Support: +1.503.667.4564 || 24x7/Emergency: +1.800.492.2240
Providing the most comprehensive  PostgreSQL solutions since 1997
             http://www.commandprompt.com/

Donate to the PostgreSQL Project: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate
PostgreSQL Replication: http://www.commandprompt.com/products/


---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 4: Have you searched our list archives?

              http://archives.postgresql.org

Reply via email to