How about adding to the general TODO in case someone finds time
On Jun 10, 2007, at 5:55 PM, Simon Riggs wrote:
On Sun, 2007-06-10 at 20:48 +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm aware of that, my point is maybe the archiver doesn't need
My questions was: why don't we start the archiving *BEFORE*
The archiver is executed from the postmaster, so thats not possible.
to be fully operational (responding to db requests) to be started
We could investigate where best to put some code, but it wouldn't be
executed very frequently.
I agree, OTOH, the more PITR is used on big busy db to more this may
Why not just execute the archive_command in a script, replacing
the .ready with .done files in archive_status directory when its
Sure, but if *I* can do it, why can't the system?
What do you think,
Just looked at the code. Does seem possible to start archiver
it has no hooks into anything else and doesn't need transactions.
Starting archiver earlier would not be the only change required, since
recovery could be very short. That will take some thought on how to
I have other things pressing on me now, but I'll add this to my todo,
though I'll be relying on you to test it when I get round to it.
Jim Nasby [EMAIL PROTECTED]
EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com 512.569.9461 (cell)
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 1: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate
subscribe-nomail command to [EMAIL PROTECTED] so that your
message can get through to the mailing list cleanly