Joshua D. Drake wrote:
> Tom Lane wrote:
> > Gregory Stark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >> Well assuming we have any SQL-level support at all I think we should
> >> strive to avoid these functions taking INTERNAL arguments.
> > That gets us down to just needing to worry about whether we like the
> > SQL representation of configurations.  Which is still a nontrivial
> > issue, but at least it seems manageable on a timescale that's
> > reasonable for 8.3.
> O.k. I am not trying to throw any cold water on this, but with the 
> limitations we are suggesting, does the patch gain us anything over just 
> leaving tsearch in contrib?

The idea is that common operations like searching and mapping dictionaries
will be easier to do, but the more complex stuff will require catalog

  Bruce Momjian  <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

  + If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +

---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 1: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate
       subscribe-nomail command to [EMAIL PROTECTED] so that your
       message can get through to the mailing list cleanly

Reply via email to