Simon Riggs wrote: > On Mon, 2007-06-18 at 11:55 -0400, Tom Lane wrote: > > "Simon Riggs" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > Since this is your idea, would you like to do this, or should I? > > > > Go for it. > > OK > > > I'm not actually convinced this is worth spending time on, > > as Greg Stark's 1-byte-varlena patch already saved more for typical > > numerics than this will. > > Understood, thats why I left this till last. This will save even more on > top of those savings. My concern is to make this change now while we > can, since we will be aiming for 8.3->8.4 to be a binary upgrade.
Would someone please explain why we are considering this so far past features freeze, and who suggtested that the 8.3->8.4 upgrade being a binary upgrade was anything more than a pipe dream? -- Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com + If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. + ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 3: Have you checked our extensive FAQ? http://www.postgresql.org/docs/faq
