Greg Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I can't think of any good reason why the bgwriter_delay can't be reduced > to 1s if that simplifies things.
The simplification Heikki suggests would save a grand total of 9 lines of C code, two of which are braces. Is it really worth it to make such stringent assumptions about what the parameter is good for? (Having a GUC parameter at all costs more lines than that, not even counting its documentation.) regards, tom lane ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 2: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster