Richard Huxton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> Tom Lane wrote:
>>> What's wrong with synchronous_commit?  It's accurate and simple.

> My concern would be that it can be read two ways:
> 1. When you commit, sync (something or other - unspecified)
> 2. Synchronise commits (to each other? to something else?)*

Well, that's a fair point.  deferred_commit would avoid that objection.

I'm not sure it's real important though --- with practically all of the
postgresql.conf variables, you really need to read the manual to know
exactly what they do.

                        regards, tom lane

---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 5: don't forget to increase your free space map settings

Reply via email to