Greg Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I'm not sure what order the patches at at 
> were listed in 
> before, but it seemed to me they'd be a whole lot more useful sorted by 
> the remaining actions on them--so that's what I did.

I think you lost at least one patch in this change, viz
"Maintaining cluster order on insert"

                        regards, tom lane

---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 4: Have you searched our list archives?


Reply via email to