Simon Riggs wrote:
On Thu, 2007-07-12 at 16:17 +0200, Florian G. Pflug wrote:
To test my PITR-slave readonly-query patch, I continously do
insert into test ...
on the master, and let the slave process the generated xlogs
The log output on the slave looks the following (unnecessary lines remove)
>> <snipped log output>>
As you can see, the COMMIT records seems to end up being logged *after*
the xlog switch. I would have expected the order
"heap-insert, commit, switch, heap-insert, commit, switch, ...", not
"heap-insert, switch, commit, heap-insert, switch, commit, ...".
Is this the expected behaviour, or just an artefact of the implementation
of xlog switches?
Can you show the exact SQL executed?
If you do INSERT ... ;select pg_switch_xlog() then the COMMIT will occur
after the switch. If you do:
then the COMMIT will occur before the switch.
Ah, you caught me - I had forgotten that pgsql -c "<statement>"
executes the statement in one transaction.
I was just going to suggest that pg_start_backup, pg_stop_backup
and pg_switch_xlog emit a warning or even an error if called
from within a larger transaction, because that's quite certainly
not what the user wants. But since those are just plain functions,
I guess checking for that might not be trivial...
If it were otherwise this would imply statements were executed prior to
the previous commit, which I hope and pray is never the case.
You can relax, the bug was located in front of the screen :-)
greetings, Florian Pflug
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 4: Have you searched our list archives?