Tom Lane wrote: > I just noticed that when the BY option was added to plpgsql FOR > loops, no real error checking was done. If you specify a zero step > value, you'll have an infinite loop. If you specify a negative > value, the loop variable will increment in the "wrong direction" > until integer overflow occurs. Neither of these behaviors seem > desirable in the least.
That seems to be fairly normal proramming language behavior. -- Peter Eisentraut http://developer.postgresql.org/~petere/ ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 7: You can help support the PostgreSQL project by donating at http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate