Tom Lane wrote:
> Heikki Linnakangas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> While looking at the HOT patch, I noticed that if there's an index tuple
>> pointing to a non-existing heap tuple, we just silently ignore it.
> This is intentional --- consider case where VACUUM has removed both
> index and heap entries while some other (amazingly slow...) process is
> in flight from the index to the heap.

Hmm. In b-tree we keep the index page pinned while we do the heap fetch
to avoid that, but apparently we don't have that interlock in other

Ok, never mind.

  Heikki Linnakangas

---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 1: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate
       subscribe-nomail command to [EMAIL PROTECTED] so that your
       message can get through to the mailing list cleanly

Reply via email to