* Joshua D. Drake ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > Stephen Frost wrote: >> * Joshua D. Drake ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: >>> How many people actually use kerberos... How many people who are using >>> kerberos are going to be running 7.3. 7.3 is no longer supported so by >>> postgresql.org so who cares. >> AOL, MIT, CMU, to name a few... I'm really annoyed at these constant >> digs at what is really a very large userbase. Perhaps they're not all >> running 7.3 but the implication that there's a small number of people >> using Kerberos is just amazingly far off. > > *cough* , compared to the number of installations *not* using kerberos it > is amazing that you would make such a far off correlation.
Oh, yea, and every place that uses Active Directory .. > Note that we are talking about Kerberos + PostgreSQL, not Kerberose in > general. I was referring to your first question, which, in my view, is the more appropriate one *anyway*. At least if you have a "PostgreSQL is going to dominate the WORLD!" point of view, as I do. :) Thanks, Stephen
Description: Digital signature