Andrew Dunstan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Tom Lane wrote: >> Anyway, we detect this directly based on the C compiler's behavior, >> and you can't argue with the compiler about it. Whatever it's >> doing is right by definition.
> Perhaps Pavan is referring to what is hardcoded in pg_config.h.win32 > which is used for MSVC builds (but not for MinGW builds, IIRC), in > which case the answer might be that in this file we need to be > pessimistic about such things, since we have no reasonable way to run > configure on this platform. Somebody had better double-check that. We don't need to be "pessimistic", we need to be *correct*, because the align values had better match the way the compiler will lay out a C struct. Otherwise struct-based access to catalog rows will fail. (I'm not sure if there are any system catalogs with float8 or int64 columns, but I'd sure not want to find out that we couldn't have one because of misconfiguration of MSVC builds.) I see though that the comment in pg_config.h.win32 claims it was derived from mechanically-generated configure output, so unless that's lying it should be OK already. AFAIK struct alignment is part of the ABI for a platform and is not subject to the whims of individual compilers, so the result from MinGW should be OK for MSVC. regards, tom lane ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 7: You can help support the PostgreSQL project by donating at http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate