Andrew Dunstan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Yes, but if we make the message DEBUG1 it won't normally. Still, I think 
> we could live with that. I'm not inclined to waste too much time on it.

Yeah.  I think the only reason it was LOG initially was because the
syslogger was pretty experimental at the time.

                        regards, tom lane

---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 4: Have you searched our list archives?


Reply via email to