"Tom Lane" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > So I'm thinking it might be time to fix this. After checking the > code, it seems like it'd be a reasonably small patch if we establish > a convention that toast tables for a temp schema pg_temp_nnn are > kept in an associated dedicated schema, named something like > pg_temp_nnn_toast or pg_toast_temp_nnn. Then functions like > isOtherTempNamespace() could still recognize these tables as temp. > It'd mean a bit more clutter in pg_namespace though.
Why not just in the same pg_temp namespace? -- Gregory Stark EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 7: You can help support the PostgreSQL project by donating at http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate
