"Tom Lane" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

> So I'm thinking it might be time to fix this.  After checking the
> code, it seems like it'd be a reasonably small patch if we establish
> a convention that toast tables for a temp schema pg_temp_nnn are
> kept in an associated dedicated schema, named something like
> pg_temp_nnn_toast or pg_toast_temp_nnn.  Then functions like
> isOtherTempNamespace() could still recognize these tables as temp.
> It'd mean a bit more clutter in pg_namespace though.

Why not just in the same pg_temp namespace?

  Gregory Stark
  EnterpriseDB          http://www.enterprisedb.com

---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 7: You can help support the PostgreSQL project by donating at


Reply via email to