"Simon Riggs" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Wed, 2007-07-25 at 22:20 +0100, Gregory Stark wrote:
>> Also, it might let us set up a standby database in the regression
>> suite which would give us some xlog coverage as well which is a
>> critical portion of the system the regression suite doesn't test at
>> all.

> I like that general thought and will help where I can.

One pretty crude test I use a lot is to "kill -9" the bgwriter or some
other subprocess immediately after the regression tests finish.
Assuming you have checkpoints far enough apart, this forces a replay
from WAL of the entire regression sequence.  Doesn't exercise archiving

                        regards, tom lane

---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 2: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster

Reply via email to