* Tom Lane ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> Andrew Dunstan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > ... Oh, and if we did allow the 
> > quote char we should surely only allow it on input - just because other 
> > programs produce absurd output there is not reason we should.
> Yeah.  The *real* problem with the patch as proposed is that it allows a
> COPY OUT to emit a file that cannot be reloaded correctly, even given
> the same options used to prepare it.  I think that the restrictions were
> put there more to prevent that scenario than to restrict COPY IN.

erp.  My apologies, I hadn't ever intended for this to be used with COPY
OUT.  For some reason I had thought my changes were isolated to the COPY
CSV IN path.  I'd be happy to adjust the patch to only accept the
quote-in-null syntax when doing a COPY CSV IN.



Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Reply via email to