On Aug 8, 2007, at 12:18 , Decibel! wrote:

On Wed, Aug 08, 2007 at 12:03:34PM -0500, Michael Glaesemann wrote:
Personally, I think expandarray is more appropriate and its
functionality probably more generally useful, as it identifies the
array indices as well. Note you can also rename the columns.

Sure. My point is that we should have a way to convert arrays to sets
and back in the backend.

Can't really argue with you there, as I find array_accum myself. (Though I'd still nit-pick that this isn't an array to set conversion, but rather array to--possibly single-column--table.)

Michael Glaesemann
grzm seespotcode net

Attachment: PGP.sig
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

Reply via email to