Gregory Stark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > "Simon Riggs" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> It would be better to release 8.3 with a new, clean, fast implementation >> of VF, than to release it with code that we *think* is right, but has so >> far proved a source of some truly obscure bugs.
> Well building a suitable replacement for VACUUM FULL is more work than I was > proposing. Reimplementing VACUUM FULL for 8.3 is right out :-(. I do want to ship a release in calendar 2007 ... > I also think it's a safer course of action to create a new command, spend one > or two releases improving it until we're sure it meets everyone's needs, then > drop the old command. Agreed. While I'd like to see V.F. dead, we need a proven replacement first. (At the same time, we shouldn't spend more effort on V.F. than we have to.) regards, tom lane ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 5: don't forget to increase your free space map settings