-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Joe Conway wrote:
> Joshua D. Drake wrote:
>> Tom Lane wrote:
>>>> Bertram Scharpf wrote:
>>>>> Wouldn't the release be a good opportunity for providing
>>>>> this little tool?
>>> As for whether we could accept this for 8.4, I thought the general
>>> consensus was that we should implement the SQL-spec WITH syntax.
>>> The only good reason for supporting CONNECT BY would be to be
>>> Oracle-compatible, which this patch isn't. (Being Oracle-compatible
>>> isn't necessarily good anyway; are we sure they don't have a patent
>>> on their way of doing this?)
>> I believe this patch is an update to the table_funcs contrib module.
> I guess I should weigh in here. I have to agree with Tom, namely that:
> 1. It is way to late for a massive change to the existing contrib for
> Postgres 8.3
I am not in anyway promoting this for inclusion in 8.3.
Joshua D. Drake
=== The PostgreSQL Company: Command Prompt, Inc. ===
Sales/Support: +1.503.667.4564 24x7/Emergency: +1.800.492.2240
PostgreSQL solutions since 1997 http://www.commandprompt.com/
UNIQUE NOT NULL
Donate to the PostgreSQL Project: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate
PostgreSQL Replication: http://www.commandprompt.com/products/
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 4: Have you searched our list archives?