On Tue, 2007-08-14 at 12:09 -0400, Tom Lane wrote: > I think this is better done by code inspection, ie, look for places that > assume HEAP_XMIN/XMAX_COMMITTED is or can be set. > > I made a pass over CVS HEAD and found some apparent trouble spots: > heapam.c lines 1843-1852 presume previous xmax can be hinted > immediately, ditto lines 2167-2176, ditto lines 2716-2725. > I think probably we should just remove those lines --- they are only > trying to save work for future tqual.c calls.
I'll check those out later tonight. -- Simon Riggs EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 6: explain analyze is your friend
