Tom Lane wrote:
> Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Is enlarging the xid field something we should consider for 8.4?
> No.  We just got the tuple header down to 24 bytes, we are not going
> to give that back and then some.
> If you are processing 6K transactions per second, you can afford to
> vacuum every couple days... and probably need to vacuum much more often
> than that anyway, to avoid table bloat.
> Possibly your respondent should think about trying to do more than one
> thing per transaction?

OK, yea, I think that makes sense.

  Bruce Momjian  <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

  + If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +

---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 7: You can help support the PostgreSQL project by donating at


Reply via email to