Tom Lane wrote: > Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > Is enlarging the xid field something we should consider for 8.4? > > No. We just got the tuple header down to 24 bytes, we are not going > to give that back and then some. > > If you are processing 6K transactions per second, you can afford to > vacuum every couple days... and probably need to vacuum much more often > than that anyway, to avoid table bloat. > > Possibly your respondent should think about trying to do more than one > thing per transaction?
OK, yea, I think that makes sense. -- Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com + If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. + ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 7: You can help support the PostgreSQL project by donating at http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate
