On 21-aug-2007, at 10:55, Alvaro Herrera wrote:

It might go in if it's correct.  If you have an answer to all the
objections then there's no reason not to include it. But I must admit I
didn't understand what was your answer to the above objection; care to

sorry, egg on my face, testing error. the revised patch doesn't catch the case of another backend deleting referenced tuples. I'll work on it some more.


---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 6: explain analyze is your friend

Reply via email to