Gregory Stark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I think we should go ahead and print a LOG message in the case where a > deadlock is detected.
That seems reasonable, but I don't find any of these other changes to be
an improvement...
regards, tom lane
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 1: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate
subscribe-nomail command to [EMAIL PROTECTED] so that your
message can get through to the mailing list cleanly
