Apologies! As Alvaro guessed it correctly I was working with 8.2 sources.
Sorry for the noise.
On 8/29/07, Tom Lane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> NikhilS <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > The attached patch should fix this.
> And break other things, no doubt. needed = 0 is a perfectly valid
> edge case and mustn't be rejected here. (In fact, I doubt you'd
> even get through the regression tests with this patch ... how much
> did you test it?)
> The real problem with what you describe is that you should have used
> > I also found the absence of a function like resetStringInfo() a bit
> > puzzling.
> CVS HEAD is way ahead of you.
> regards, tom lane