"Gregory Maxwell" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> There seems to be some behavior change in current CVS with respect to
> gist and gin indexes on varchar[]. Some side effect of the tsearch2
> merge?

I think more likely I broke it during the opfamily rewrite :-(.  Looks
like I left out entries for _varchar (and _cidr too) thinking that the
binary-compatible functions in the same opfamily for _text and _inet
would serve ... but they won't, because arrays are never really "binary
compatible" (you have to at least substitute the other element type
OID).  Will fix.

                        regards, tom lane

---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 1: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate
       subscribe-nomail command to [EMAIL PROTECTED] so that your
       message can get through to the mailing list cleanly

Reply via email to