"Gregory Maxwell" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > There seems to be some behavior change in current CVS with respect to > gist and gin indexes on varchar[]. Some side effect of the tsearch2 > merge?
I think more likely I broke it during the opfamily rewrite :-(. Looks like I left out entries for _varchar (and _cidr too) thinking that the binary-compatible functions in the same opfamily for _text and _inet would serve ... but they won't, because arrays are never really "binary compatible" (you have to at least substitute the other element type OID). Will fix. regards, tom lane ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 1: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate subscribe-nomail command to [EMAIL PROTECTED] so that your message can get through to the mailing list cleanly