On 9/5/07, Tom Lane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> "Brendan Jurd" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Am I on the right page?
> Got it in one, I believe.

In that case, +1 for your proposed changes.

At first, like Florian, I found the idea of a SET LOCAL ever
persisting beyond a function astonishing, but that's because I was
approaching the term LOCAL from a programming frame of mind, not an
SQL one.  Once you appreciate that LOCAL means local to the
transaction, rather than local to the programming context, it all
makes sense.


---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 4: Have you searched our list archives?


Reply via email to