This has been saved for the 8.4 release:
http://momjian.postgresql.org/cgi-bin/pgpatches_hold
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Greg Smith wrote:
> On Thu, 2 Aug 2007, Tom Lane wrote:
>
> > I find it entirely likely that simply changing the [NUM_CLOG_BUFFERS]
> > constant would be a net loss on many workloads.
>
> Would it be reasonable to consider changing it to a compile-time option
> before the 8.3 beta? From how you describe the potential downsides, it
> sounds to me like something that specific distributors might want to
> adjust based on their target customer workloads and server scale. That
> would make it available as a tunable to those aiming at larger systems
> with enough CPU/memory throughput that the additional overhead of more
> linear searches is trumped by the reduced potential for locking
> contention, as appears to be the case in Sun's situation here.
>
> --
> * Greg Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.gregsmith.com Baltimore, MD
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 1: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate
> subscribe-nomail command to [EMAIL PROTECTED] so that your
> message can get through to the mailing list cleanly
--
Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com
+ If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 4: Have you searched our list archives?
http://archives.postgresql.org
