Am Dienstag, 9. Oktober 2007 schrieb Simon Riggs:
> On Tue, 2007-10-09 at 14:25 +0200, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> > I believe, however, that this approach is wrong.  The "real error", as
> > you put it, is the one reported by the kernel -- by definition. 
> > Everything else is at best a "hint".
> Are you objecting to making the wording of the hint/error clearer?

Not at all.  I'm just trying to point out that it's not quite as obvious as it 
may seem.  Let's see a patch.

Peter Eisentraut

---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 4: Have you searched our list archives?


Reply via email to