Bruce Momjian wrote:
Tom Lane wrote:
Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
I don't see how timing has anything to do with this. You could have
added it between beta1 and beta2 after sufficient hackers discussion.
Uh, it *was* after beta1.
Oh, so it didn't hold up beta1 --- that's good.
No it's not.
Can somebody please explain to me what beta means if you can commit new
stuff after it has been declared?
cheers
andrew
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 6: explain analyze is your friend
