Dave Page wrote:
> Peter Eisentraut wrote:
>> Am Mittwoch, 10. Oktober 2007 schrieb Dave Page:
>>> So is it just a case of us generating a list of matches that may be
>>> Windows specific, or is there more to it than that?
>> You want to peruse src/port/chklocale.c.  There is already explicit Windows 
>> support in there, so maybe you just need to add on your particular cases.
> Yup, found that - thanks. I'll look at updating that list.

OK so I added the appropriate entries (and posted the patch to
-patches), but my original question remains: why can I only select the
*default* encoding for the chosen locale, but not other ones that are
also be valid according to setlocale? Is this a bug, or is there some
technical reason?


---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 2: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster

Reply via email to