Alexey Klyukin wrote: > > >> For what use cases do you think your WAL-based approach is better than >> Slony/Skytools trigger-based one ? >> > > A pure trigger based approach can only replicate data for the commands > which fire triggers. AFAIK Slony is unable to replicate TRUNCATE > command It could be wrapped with ddl_script which obviously isn't transparent to the application, but I guess a table that's truncated regularly won't be a typical candidate for (async) replication either.
Regards, Andreas ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 7: You can help support the PostgreSQL project by donating at http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate