On Fri, 2007-10-12 at 12:42 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Simon Riggs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > On Fri, 2007-10-12 at 11:26 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> >> Why not SIGINT?
> > I must be missing something. How would I tell the difference between
> > manual and automatic cancels if we use SIGINT for both cases?
> Why do you need to?  I thought the plan was that DeadlockCheck would
> only try to signal autovac workers.


On Fri, 2007-10-12 at 10:19 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:

> In short: put in the automatic lock cancel for regular vacuums, disable
> it for antiwraparound vacuums, but don't disable manual cancels; and
> definitely don't invent a complicated new set of behaviors around that.

So you mean "dont allow automatic cancels of manually submitted

I thought you meant don't disable manually-requested cancels of

Can you explain further what you meant by "don't disable manual

(laughs) wish I had a pound for every time we'd misunderstood each
other, or at least, a pound every time I misunderstood you. :-)

  Simon Riggs
  2ndQuadrant  http://www.2ndQuadrant.com

---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 9: In versions below 8.0, the planner will ignore your desire to
       choose an index scan if your joining column's datatypes do not

Reply via email to