"Kevin Grittner" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Fri, Oct 26, 2007 at  5:47 PM, in message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
> Tom Lane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: 
>> And after
>> each archive_timeout, we test to see if we need to flush the current WAL
>> segment out to the archive; which is determined by whether the write
>> pointer is currently exactly at the start of a segment or not.
> Hmmm...  We would actually prefer to get the WAL file at the
> specified interval.

Well, if it's a feature not a bug, that's fine with me.  I wonder though
how predictable the behavior will really be with 8.3's distributed
checkpoints ... you might need to find another way anyhow.

                        regards, tom lane

---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 7: You can help support the PostgreSQL project by donating at


Reply via email to