At 13:04 27/03/01 +0200, Marko Kreen wrote:
>On Tue, Mar 27, 2001 at 07:54:15AM +1000, Mike Cannon-Brookes wrote:
> > Well Peter, I must say many would disagree with you there ;)
>
>* NSHO about ant deleted *
>
> > 3) currently we seem to have a build process that is 99% Ant and 1% make
> > (for 4 substitutions). It seems unnecessarily complex to add make when we
> > can remove it completely and not lose any functionality.
>
>Peter E, Peter M: how about build.xml.in, where the needed
>substitutions are done in configure end-phase? I can prepare
>patch if this is acceptable.
For me that would be a good idea (remember there are three build.xml files)
- it's just that I don't know enough about autoconf to do it myself :-)
The main one for a build.xml.in would be the jdbc one, but ideally the one
in the root would be the one ant should call.
PeterM
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 4: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster
