On 04 Sep 2001 13:22:33 -0400, Dave Cramer wrote:
>> Isn't the JDBC 2 driver also an implementation of JDBC 1?
>Yes, it is, but many of the libraries, and methods which are used in
>version 2 of the driver aren't available in jdk1 so it won't compile or
>run.
Ah, I see. And I assume we support JDBC 1 for applets that need
to run in popular browsers with a JVM 1.
Has it been discussed before when and how we can stop
maintaining two versions?
Are people really still using JDBC 1?
Regards,
René Pijlman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 3: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate
subscribe-nomail command to [EMAIL PROTECTED] so that your
message can get through to the mailing list cleanly
