Can I have a new version of this for application?
>
>
> Dave Harkness wrote:
> > At 12:41 PM 9/5/2001, Joseph Shraibman wrote:
> >
> >> new patch:
> >
> >
> > There still seems to be an error with the same if-block.
> >
> > ! if (index>=-rows.size())
> > ! internalIndex=rows.size()+index;
> >
> > becomes
> >
> > ! if (index > -rows_size)
> > ! internalIndex = rows_size+index;
> >
> > Note that the original used >=, not >.
>
> Argh! I need a better screen. :(
> >
> > Also, why is the first edit being done? Granted it's faster in that it
> > doesn't null out the array of rows, but won't that have other effects?
>
> No. Nulling out the array is pointless.
>
>
>
>
> --
> Joseph Shraibman
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Increase signal to noise ratio. http://www.targabot.com
>
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 1: subscribe and unsubscribe commands go to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
[EMAIL PROTECTED] | (610) 853-3000
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue
+ Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 5: Have you checked our extensive FAQ?
http://www.postgresql.org/users-lounge/docs/faq.html
