Dave Harkness <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> The problem I'm seeing is that two database transactions, 
> initiated via JDBC, are able to obtain simultaneous exclusive table locks 
> on the same table.

Sounds to me like JDBC is feeding all your commands through a single
database connection, which means that what you think are independent
transactions are really not.  Better take a closer look at what you're

                        regards, tom lane

---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 4: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster

Reply via email to