Ned, This is a community of volunteers. So if someone wants to work on JDBC3 that is fine. We don't have the option of telling people how they should spend their time.
But I agree that jdbc2 still has a bunch of stuff that could be done. Although much if what remains undone isn't required by the spec. thanks, --Barry Ned Wolpert wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > > Ok, I understand. > > So, why are people talking about support for JDBC3 where JDBC2 support isn't > even there? > > On 26-Oct-2001 Barry Lind wrote: > >>Ned, >> >>It may or may not work. That file hasn't been changed in a long time, >>so I doubt anyone is using it and therefore it may no longer work. >> >>I don't want to give people the false impression that the javax.sql set >>of extensions to JDBC2 is supported by the jdbc driver by providing a >>jdbc7.2-1.2ee.jar file when we only implement 1 interface out of the 13 >>defined in that package. >> >>thanks, >>--Barry >> >> >> >>Ned Wolpert wrote: >> >> >>>-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- >>>Hash: SHA1 >>> >>>Humm... are you saying that the class PostgresqlDataSource doesn't work? I >>>guess I'm not sure what doesn't work with the driver. (Course, I've been >>>using >>>PoolMan as the datasource to wrap the postgresql default connection rather >>>than >>>using the datasource object, so I haven't been testing this myself, yet.) >>> >>> >>> >>>On 26-Oct-2001 Barry Lind wrote: >>> >>> >>>>Ned, >>>> >>>>There really isn't a j2ee driver for postgres. If you build the j2ee >>>>driver it is essentially the same as the j2se driver. So I don't see >>>>any reason to confuse people by letting them think there really is a >>>>difference by having two different java2 drivers to choose from on the >>>>web site. >>>> >>>>The only difference is some code that I consider questionable, and I >>>>don't think even works. >>>> >>>>thanks, >>>>--Barry >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>>Ned Wolpert wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>>>-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- >>>>>Hash: SHA1 >>>>> >>>>>Folks- >>>>> >>>>> I checked out the jdbc driver for 7.2b1 on the jdbc.postgresql.org >>>>> website >>>>>(http://jdbc.postgresql.org/download/jdbc7.2b1-1.2.jar) and I was going to >>>>>submit it for testing with the castor project. One problem... it's only >>>>>the >>>>>default driver. I think the website should have the default one, and the >>>>>j2ee >>>>>(jdk1.2e+) one available. Thoughts? >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>Virtually, >>>>>Ned Wolpert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >>>>> >>>>>D08C2F45: 28E7 56CB 58AC C622 5A51 3C42 8B2B 2739 D08C 2F45 >>>>>-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- >>>>>Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux) >>>>>Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org >>>>> >>>>>iD8DBQE72J4xiysnOdCML0URAvl6AJ90aNX33co+5BH23/kgeK2YX/OlvwCdHbMV >>>>>voujwk16eZ04pJvH5iTCJTQ= >>>>>=36ME >>>>>-----END PGP SIGNATURE----- >>>>> >>>>>---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- >>>>>TIP 2: you can get off all lists at once with the unregister command >>>>> (send "unregister YourEmailAddressHere" to [EMAIL PROTECTED]) >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>> >>>Virtually, >>>Ned Wolpert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >>> >>>D08C2F45: 28E7 56CB 58AC C622 5A51 3C42 8B2B 2739 D08C 2F45 >>>-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- >>>Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux) >>>Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org >>> >>>iD8DBQE72YusiysnOdCML0URApmaAJ9rHvs0TGF0FdgKTq+ZE86bi7o4jgCfYJ7a >>>/QTFI0POE6TO6hQEBwidE3g= >>>=YFMc >>>-----END PGP SIGNATURE----- >>> >>> >>> > > > Virtually, > Ned Wolpert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > D08C2F45: 28E7 56CB 58AC C622 5A51 3C42 8B2B 2739 D08C 2F45 > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- > Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux) > Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org > > iD8DBQE72aI7iysnOdCML0URApAJAJ0eDaIF+I81WoA+NI2kBeD2vpCmRgCfZriP > dcEU0c1UR2fZI3RTJkGddpw= > =DQ7t > -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- > > ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 5: Have you checked our extensive FAQ? http://www.postgresql.org/users-lounge/docs/faq.html
