Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I have never seen YY/MM/DD, only YYYY-MM-DD.
You have apparently forgotten what was standard practice just a few years ago. > The huge problem is > deciding out how to decode 03-02-01. I think we have to require the > century for those. No, the entire point is to drive it off datestyle, *not* off the input value ranges. > If that is the only issue, I can ask on general, but I doubt someone is > going to pipe up. I really dislike the idea that we are going to legislate this behavior in a three-person discussion on -patches. The people who will be screaming about it don't read -patches. regards, tom lane ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 4: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster